The government has said in response that a different individual who worked for Epstein would testify that they were aware of “two sets of contact books maintained in Epstein’s residences, both of which were printed and bound in a distinctive format.” The first book belonged to Epstein, and the second was commonly referred to as Maxwell’s book, prosecutors allege.
Rodriguez, what he did with it for as long as he had it, who may have created the exhibit, and where it came from.” Rodriguez has since died, so he can’t testify to it. In court filings, her legal team has argued that no one “knows where or when the exhibit was acquired by Mr. Maxwell’s lawyers has asked the judge to exclude the book from the trial. “There are some serious questions about how the book was obtained, who made the entries and whether the writing can be linked directly to the defendant,” MacDougall says. And in the opinion of Mark MacDougall, a former federal prosecutor, the government “will have to overcome some significant obstacles” to do so. Only then can it actually be admitted into evidence. Here’s What They Saidīut this is all dependent on whether the government can actually prove that the book is both authentic and belongs to Maxwell. Read more: 23 of Jeffrey Epstein’s Accusers Finally Got Their Day in Court. And if the book includes the contact information of any alleged victim’s parents, for example, that might help prosecutors establish that Maxwell knew the victims were underage. If those victims’ names appear under the heading “massage”-which reportedly appears in the book-it could further help the government establish that she was communicating with the victims to arrange massages for Epstein, one of their alleged tactics for recruiting girls for sexual abuse. If the address book belonged to Maxwell and contained victims’ name and contact informations, it would “help establish that narrative and corroborate the victims’ anticipated testimony,” she says. The government alleges Maxwell was in communication with Epstein’s victims and cultivated relationships with them on his behalf. “Its significance could be multifold,” says Roth. Maxwell disputes.” Maxwell’s lawyers contend the contents of the book are “neither authentic nor relevant,” arguing that the fact that the book did not surface until 2009 shows “there is no relevance that can be attached to the information.” How might the book come up in Maxwell’s case? In her filing, Maxwell’s attorneys said that those are “bold, unexplained claims that Ms.
0 kommentar(er)
